Eric Hauser's Blog http://erichauser.net J2EE, .NET, and general technology Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:09:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 en Validating method parameters with Castle Validator http://erichauser.net/2008/09/18/validating-method-parameters-with-castle-validator/ http://erichauser.net/2008/09/18/validating-method-parameters-with-castle-validator/#comments Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:09:25 +0000 ehauser http://erichauser.net/?p=80 Been pretty busy at work, so short post. 

I’ve added a facility in Castle contrib for validating method parameters using Castle Validator.  The goal is to eventually allow have this used for validate parameters in Monorail, but right now I’m using it to do input validation for web service parameters.  I wrote up a brief blurb on how to use it here: http://using.castleproject.org/display/Contrib/Castle.Facilities.MethodValidator.  Should be pretty self explanatory.

If anyone finds any issues, let me know.

]]> http://erichauser.net/2008/09/18/validating-method-parameters-with-castle-validator/feed/ Castle Validator Enhancements http://erichauser.net/2008/08/28/castle-validator-enhancements/ http://erichauser.net/2008/08/28/castle-validator-enhancements/#comments Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:30:57 +0000 ehauser http://erichauser.net/?p=75 I have contributed a couple of enhancements to Castle.Components.Validator that have been committed to the trunk.  Besides using attributes, validations can now be supplied in code using the [ValidateSelf] attribute:

Each of the above validations *could* be done by using an attribute and a custom validator, but expressing validations in code is much simpler for these types of one off validations. You can have as many methods decorated with [ValidateSelf] on an object you want as long as they have the above method signature (void return and one ErrorSummary parameter).  You can also specify the RunWhen and ExecutionOrder just like regular validators.

The second enhancement is the IValidationContributor interface. This allows you contribute to the validation of an object beyond the default validation. The interface is fairly simplistic:

You can extend AbstractValidationContributor so that you can perform initialization for a given type.  The SelfValidationContributor implements the logic for recognizing and executing the self validation feature above.  You can write custom contributors that can be injected into the DefaultValidatorRunner for things like retrieving validations from the container and invoking them on the object.

Enjoy!

]]> http://erichauser.net/2008/08/28/castle-validator-enhancements/feed/ NServiceBus Facility Enhancements http://erichauser.net/2008/08/23/nservicebus-facility-enhancements/ http://erichauser.net/2008/08/23/nservicebus-facility-enhancements/#comments Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:59:41 +0000 ehauser http://erichauser.net/?p=62 I have added a couple of additions to Ayende’s NServiceBus Facility:

  • Message handlers and sagas are automatically registered with the container for the defined assemblies
  • Message handlers are proxied
  • You can register IHandlerFilter instances with the kernel that allow for interception of messages as they are processed
  • Using my replay strategy implementation, you can decorate a message handler as [Idempotent(Attemps = 5, Delay = 2000)].  That means that a message will be retried when an exception is thrown processing the message 5 times, delaying 2 seconds between each retry.  This could also be extended so that depending on the type of exception that is being thrown, a default retry strategy is applied.

  • The bus is started automatically once all handler dependencies have been satisfied

There were a couple of interesting things that I found when implementing this.  One, NServiceBus retrieives handlers from the kernel using the concrete class instance (looking back Ayende noted this as “yuck”).  That means that we cannot proxy the interface, but instead have to create a class proxy for our message handlers.  That means that when we the message handlers, we have to verify that the message handler methods are virtual and give a nice error if they are not:

Very easy to do with Castle’s fluent interface for registration.  Sagas, on the other hand, have to be registered in the container by each of their interfaces because saga instances are retrieve by calling builder.Build<ISaga<SomeMessage>>().

Out of the box, the way to do message interception with NSB is to have message handlers chained in a specified order.  The IHandlerFilter provides another method for message interception.  If you have a new filter to add, all you have to do is register the IHandlerFilter instance with the container:

The filters follow the chain of responsibility pattern, so they can be short circuited — which is the same as calling bus.DoNotContinueDispatchingCurrentMessageToHandlers().

I have attached the updates to the post: nservicebus-fullduplex-xml-update.  Enjoy.

]]> http://erichauser.net/2008/08/23/nservicebus-facility-enhancements/feed/ Profiling MSTest (and why I had to do it) http://erichauser.net/2008/08/22/profiling-mstest-and-why-i-had-to-do-it/ http://erichauser.net/2008/08/22/profiling-mstest-and-why-i-had-to-do-it/#comments Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:04:46 +0000 ehauser http://erichauser.net/?p=55 I got an email earlier this week from a member of our team saying that they had noticed odd behavior in our unit tests.  They said when the ran the tests from Visual Studio, the memory allocation increased by about 500MB.  When they ran the tests again, the memory increased another 500MB, and so forth.  The system component that developer was working on had the most tests out of all of our components, so he was noticing this before others did. 

First of all, it seemed odd that unit tests would cause Visual Studio’s memory to increase since the tests are run in another process.  I knew it would probably be impossible to profile Visual Studio itself, so I profiled out tests from the command line to see what if anything I could figure out.  A couple of tricks to profiling MSTest.exe:

  • Launch mstest.exe with the /noisolation option so that the tests are run in process
  • When you use the /noisolation option, you have to replace \Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE\MSTest.exe.config with the App.config for your tests.  You also need to add the this:

    <runtime>
        <assemblyBinding xmlns=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1″>
            <probing privatePath=”PrivateAssemblies;PublicAssemblies”/>
        </assemblyBinding>
    </runtime>

The first thing I noticed after all of the tests ran was that 98% of the memory was being held by System.String.  When I looked to see what objects were referencing System.String, one thing blaringly stood out:

 

All of the standard out was being held in a single member variable from the whole test run.  Since I was not sure if Visual Studio was doing the same thing, I turned off logging in our application and ran the tests again.  Surprise, that worked.  Visual Studio no longer was increasing in memory usage.

Yes, I realize 800 MB of log output is a lot but that is not really the issue – I’m not sure why VS keeps that output in memory.  Once it has the test results, I believe it writes it out to a file so why keep it around?

]]> http://erichauser.net/2008/08/22/profiling-mstest-and-why-i-had-to-do-it/feed/ ActiveRecord Session Scope and WCF Redux http://erichauser.net/2008/08/06/activerecord-session-scope-and-wcf-redux/ http://erichauser.net/2008/08/06/activerecord-session-scope-and-wcf-redux/#comments Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:10:36 +0000 ehauser http://erichauser.net/?p=57 Awhile ago, I posted a solution I was using for a project for managing SessionScope with WCF using an ICallContextInitializer. Because of another issue in the codebase (an error in a custom listener), an exception was getting thrown when session.Dispose() was called in the AfterInvoke method.  What was interesting was that it appeared to the client that the WCF call had completed successfully — even though this was not the case.  It turns out that ICallContextInitializer is not the best WCF extension to use to manage the scope. Here’s a quick console application that will show the behavior of throwing an exception in AfterInvoke. Notice how the console window will crash before the ReadKey is hit:  

 

   1: class Program
   2: {
   3:     static void Main(string[] args)
   4:     {
   5:         using (var host = new ServiceHost(typeof(Operation)))
   6:         {
   7:             var endpointAddress = new EndpointAddress("net.tcp://localhost/optest");
   8:             var endpoint = new ServiceEndpoint(ContractDescription.GetContract(typeof(IOperation)),
   9:                                                new NetTcpBinding(),
  10:                                                endpointAddress);
  11:             endpoint.Behaviors.Add(new ThrowBehavior());
  12:             host.Description.Endpoints.Add(endpoint);
  13:             host.Open();
  14:  
  15:             var op = ChannelFactory<IOperation>.CreateChannel(new NetTcpBinding(), endpointAddress);
  16:             op.Op();
  17:         }
  18:  
  19:         Console.ReadKey();
  20:     }
  21: }
  22:  
  23:
 [ServiceContract]
  24: public interface IOperation
  25: {
  26:     [OperationContract]
  27:     void Op();
  28: }
  29:  
  30: public class Operation : IOperation
  31: {
  32:     public void Op()
  33:     {
  34:     } 
  35: }
  36:  
  37: internal class ThrowBehavior : IEndpointBehavior
  38: {
  39:     public void Validate(ServiceEndpoint endpoint)
  40:     {
  41:     }
  42:  
  43:     public void AddBindingParameters(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)
  44:     {
  45:     }
  46:  
  47:     public void Apply
DispatchBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, EndpointDispatcher endpointDispatcher)
  48:     {
  49:         foreach (DispatchOperation operation in endpointDispatcher.DispatchRuntime.Operations)
  50:         {
  51:             operation.CallContextInitializers.Add(new ThrowCallContextInitializer());
  52:         }
  53:     }
  54:  
  55:     public void ApplyClientBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, ClientRuntime clientRuntime)
  56:     {
  57:     }
  58: }
  59:  
  60: internal class ThrowCallContextInitializer : ICallContextInitializer
  61: {
  62:     public object BeforeInvoke(InstanceContext instanceContext, IClientChannel channel, Message message)
  63:     {
  64:         return null;
  65:     }
  66:  
  67:     public void AfterInvoke(object correlationState)
  68:     {
  69:         throw new InvalidOperationException();

  70:     }
  71: }

 

My revised code uses a DispatchMessageInterceptor instead:

 

   1: public class ARSessionScopeBehavior : IEndpointBehavior
   2: {
   3:     
   4:     /// <summary>
   5:     /// Implement to pass data at runtime to bindings to support custom behavior.
   6:     /// </summary>
   7:     /// <param name="endpoint">The endpoint to modify.</param>
   8:     /// <param name="bindingParameters">The objects that binding elements require to support the behavior.</param>
   9:     public void AddBindingParameters(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)
  10:     {
  11:     }
  12:  
  13:     /// <summary>
  14:     /// Implements a modification or extension of the service across an endpoint.
  15:     /// </summary>
  16:     /// <param name="endpoint">The endpoint that exposes the contract.</param>
  17:     /// <param name="endpointDispatcher">The endpoint dispatcher to be modified or extended.</param>
  18:     public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, EndpointDispatcher endpointDispatcher)
  19:     {
  20:         endpointDispatcher.DispatchRuntime.MessageInspectors.Add(new ARDispatcherMessageInspector());
  21:     }
  22:  
  23:     /// <summary>
  24:     /// Implements a modification or extension of the client across an endpoint.
  25:     /// </summary>
  26:     /// <param name="endpoint">The endpoint that is to be customized.</param>
  27:     /// <param name="clientRuntime">The client runtime to be customized.</param>
  28:     public void ApplyClientBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, ClientRuntime clientRuntime)
  29:     {
  30:     }
  31:  
  32:     /// <summary>
  33:     /// Implement to confirm that the endpoint meets some intended criteria.
  34:     /// </summary>
  35:     /// <param name="endpoint">The endpoint to validate.</param>
  36:     public void Validate(ServiceEndpoint endpoint)
  37:     {
  38:     }
  39:  
  40: }

 

   1: public class ARDispatchMessageInspector : IDispatchMessageInspector
   2:  {
   3:  
   4:      private static readonly ILogger Logger = LogManager.GetLogger(ARDispatchMessageInspector);
   5:  
   6:      private const string ActiveRecordSessionScopeKey = "wcf.ar.sessionscope";
   7:  
   8:      #region Implementation of IDispatchMessageInspector
   9:  
  10:      /// <summary>
  11:      /// Called after an inbound message has been received but before the message is dispatched to the intended operation.
  12:      /// </summary>
  13:      /// <returns>
  14:      /// The object used to correlate state. This object is passed back in the <see cref="M:System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.IDispatchMessageInspector.BeforeSendReply(System.ServiceModel.Channels.Message@,System.Object)" /> method.
  15:      /// </returns>
  16:      /// <param name="request">The request message.</param>
  17:      /// <param name="channel">The incoming channel.</param>
  18:      /// <param name="instanceContext">The current service instance.</param>
  19:      public object AfterReceiveRequest(ref Message request, IClientChannel channel, InstanceContext instanceContext)
  20:      {
  21:          var scope = Local.Data[ActiveRecordSessionScopeKey] as SessionScope;
  22:          if (scope == null)
  23:          {
  24:              Logger.Debug("Creating new ActiveRecord SessonScope");
  25:              scope = new SessionScope();
  26:              Local.Data[ActiveRecordSessionScopeKey] = scope;
  27:          }
  28:          return null;
  29:      }
  30:  
  31:      /// <summary>
  32:      /// Called after the operation has returned but before the reply message is sent.
  33:      /// </summary>
  34:      /// <param name="reply">The reply message. This value is null if the operation is one way.</param>
  35:      /// <param name="correlationState">The correlation object returned from the <see cref="M:System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.IDispatchMessageInspector.AfterReceiveRequest(System.ServiceModel.Channels.Message@,System.ServiceModel.IClientChannel,System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext)" /> method.</param>
  36:      public void BeforeSendReply(ref Message reply, object correlationState)
  37:      {
  38:          var scope = Local.Data[ActiveRecordSessionScopeKey] as SessionScope;
  39:          if (scope != null)
  40:          {
  41:              if (SessionScope.Current == scope)
  42:              {
  43:                  Logger.Debug("Disposing ActiveRecord SessonScope");
  44:                  scope.Dispose();
  45:              }
  46:              else
  47:              {
  48:                  Logger.Warn(
  49:                      "The current Active Record session scope does not equal the correlated session scope from WCF.  This scope will not " +
  50:                      "be disposed, however, this could lead to entities not being properly flushed.");
  51:              }
  52:              Local.Data[ActiveRecordSessionScopeKey] = null;
  53:          }
  54:      }

 

So far, no problems.  Funny enough, when searching for solutions to this problem, I noticed some other posts where people recommended using the ICallContextInitializer to manage unit of work.  I assume they just have not had any issues when calling Dispose() and have not seen this behavior.

]]> http://erichauser.net/2008/08/06/activerecord-session-scope-and-wcf-redux/feed/ Advanced ActiveRecord Models - Part 2 http://erichauser.net/2008/07/09/advanced-activerecord-models-part-2/ http://erichauser.net/2008/07/09/advanced-activerecord-models-part-2/#comments Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:42:48 +0000 ehauser http://erichauser.net/?p=56 In part 1, I discussed what Castle ActiveRecord does when starting up and ways you can modify the model after is has been generated.  Another useful trick is to add custom attributes to your model that can be inspected while ActiveRecord is inspecting its model.  To this you need to create a class that implements Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework.Internal.IModelBuilderExtension and register it with the ActiveRecordStarter.

 

For my example, let’s assume that we want to implement soft deletes using ActiveRecord.  The NHibernate FAQ has a great blog entry on how to make NHibernate mark a entity as deleted as opposed to deleting it from the database.  Assuming you are using their model of marking your entities as ISoftDeleteable, here are two things we can do to extend this model:

 

  1. If session.Get(id) is called on soft deleted record, null is returned.
  2. If a collection contains a record that has been soft deleted, that record will not show up when the collection is loaded.

 

I am not entirely sure that these two features are something that you want to necessarily do, however, they are good examples for what I am trying to show.  The reason I say that is because I am not sure you want entities showing up sometimes and not other times, i.e. a soft deleted model would show up for a custom query unless someone checks the Deleted flag, how do soft deletes work across entity graphs, should we allow both ends of a bidirectional relationship to be soft deleteable, etc.  So, I have kept this example limited too two easy features, but remember to think about this a little more before actually implementing it.  So on to the example, the first thing we need to is to add a custom model builder to inspect our model:

 

   1: public class SoftDeleteModelBuilderExtension : IModelBuilderExtension
   2: {
   3:  
   4:     public static IDictionary<Type, SoftDeleteModel> SoftDeleteModels = new Dictionary<Type, SoftDeleteModel>();
   5:  
   6:     #region IModelBuilderExtension Members
   7:  
   8:     public void ProcessBelongsTo(System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pi, BelongsToModel belongsToModel, ActiveRecordModel model)
   9:     {
  10:     }
  11:  
  12:     public void ProcessClass(Type type, ActiveRecordModel model)
  13:     {
  14:         GetModel(type, model);
  15:     }
  16:  
  17:     public void ProcessField(System.Reflection.FieldInfo fi, ActiveRecordModel model)
  18:     {
  19:     }
  20:  
  21:     public void ProcessHasAndBelongsToMany(System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pi, HasAndBelongsToManyModel hasAndBelongManyModel, ActiveRecordModel model)
  22:     {
  23:         if (!IsSoftModel(hasAndBelongManyModel.HasManyAtt.MapType)) return;
  24:         var softDeleteModel = GetModel(model.Type, model);
  25:         softDeleteModel.HasAndBelongsToMany.Add(hasAndBelongManyModel);
  26:     }
  27:  
  28:     public void ProcessHasMany(System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pi, HasManyModel hasManyModel, ActiveRecordModel model)
  29:     {
  30:         if (!IsSoftModel(hasManyModel.HasManyAtt.MapType)) return;
  31:         var softDeleteModel = GetModel(model.Type, model);
  32:         softDeleteModel.HasMany.Add(hasManyModel);
  33:     }
  34:  
  35:     public void ProcessHasManyToAny(System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pi, HasManyToAnyModel hasManyModel, ActiveRecordModel model)
  36:     {
  37:         if (!IsSoftModel(hasManyModel.HasManyToAnyAtt.MapType)) return;
  38:         var softDeleteModel = GetModel(model.Type, model);
  39:         softDeleteModel.ManyToAny.Add(hasManyModel);
  40:     }
  41:  
  42:     public void ProcessProperty(System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pi, ActiveRecordModel model)
  43:     {
  44:     }
  45:  
  46:     private static bool IsSoftModel(Type type)
  47:     {
  48:         return (typeof(ISoftDeleteable).IsAssignableFrom(type));
  49:     }
  50:  
  51:     private static SoftDeleteModel GetModel(Type type, ActiveRecordModel model)
  52:     {
  53:         SoftDeleteModel softDeleteModel;
  54:         SoftDeleteModels.TryGetValue(type, out softDeleteModel);
  55:  
  56:         if (softDeleteModel == null)
  57:         {
  58:             softDeleteModel = new SoftDeleteModel {Type = type, ActiveRecordModel = model};
  59:             if (IsSoftModel(type))
  60:                 softDeleteModel.SoftDeleteable = true;
  61:             SoftDeleteModels[type] = softDeleteModel;
  62:         }
  63:         return softDeleteModel;
  64:     }
  65:  
  66:     #endregion
  67: }

 

   1: public class SoftDeleteModel
   2: {
   3:     /// <summary>
   4:     /// Gets or sets the type.
   5:     /// </summary>
   6:     /// <value>The type.</value>
   7:     public Type Type { get; set; }
   8:  
   9:     /// <summary>
  10:     /// Gets or sets a value indicating whether the model is soft deleteable.